Your policy has been one which I fully understand — I’m not second-guessing — of one child per family. The result being that you’re in a position where one wage earner will be taking care of four retired people. Not sustainable.
Forcing families to limit themselves to one child? Forced abortions? He fully understands? But now they're in a pickle because the workforce isn't large enough to support a wealth-transfer Ponzi scam like our Social Security, that's the problem with the one-child policy?
This guy is giving chase to Dan Quayle's title as dumbest vice president in modern times.